A recent article in the Financial Times, refers to CDS as an anti-social product. Its very interesting to know why. As many of you might know, a CDS involves 3 parties. One which has granted credit to another party (e.g. Corporation A gives credit to Corporation B) and the third which insures that loan (e.g. AIG). If company B fails to pay-back or has a credit downgrade, AIG would compensate company A. In return for this protection, Company A pays AIG a regular premium (insurance premium).
Thus CDS is anti-social as there is an incentive for Company A debt holders that Company B fails. There are also real cases wherein the debt holders of Company A forced Company B to go bankrupt. But what if the intermediary who provides for the protection (AIG in this case) also fails? This is what exactly happened ! Company A was left to the street along-with Company B and all the intermediary insurance providers.....The Financial world was paralysed and is still recovering......